[U: O/T Redacted] It Is My View That Uniformity Would Have Been Better, But Much Of The Benefit Has Already Been Achieved… On OSHA Vax Standard.

Without the Labor Department’s otherwise uniform rule, larger multi-state employers will now face a patchwork of regulations, some conflicting, state by state. [Tomorrow’s official withdrawal, here — as a PDF.] This should (in a rational world) be an issue larger GOP friendly employers should care about: they should have been careful what they wished for. Now they face a patchwork of conflicting state standards — greatly increasing their regulatory burden, with no discernible benefit. That used to be St. Ronnie’s complaint, about federal regulations. Now, since Texas and Florida are outliers, larger employers are left unsure of which laws to follow. Charming. Well done, Tangerine-heads. End update.

But so be it — employers are entitled to make reasonable rules about eligibility for a job, or even continued employment, for current long time employees. Most large employers in the North, especially, have already adopted what amounts to mandatory vaccination rules. Any state level challenges by employees (for example in Texas or Florida) should be met with the answer that no one has a “property right“, to work for a given employer. That is the mantra of the GOP, on all other (i.e., race discrimination) fronts, related to employment. The GOP sees it as a hard “at will” rule. So I expect that most southern employees who bring state level suits against a nationwide employer (like Amazon), for forcing vaccines… will not prevail — even in Florida and Texas. [In what amounts to a clearly-intentional bit of irony, of course Govs. Abbott and DeSantis and their cohorts will continue to blame President Biden for not stopping the pandemic they themselves are prolonging — in their states.] But we shall see.

As I’ve earlier reported — excepting only GE — I do not think any employer with over 80,000 employees in the US has decided to no longer require vaccinations, now that these employers have ALREADY adopted those workplace rules. Here’s the latest:

…The Biden administration is withdrawing its requirement that large employers mandate workers be vaccinated or regularly tested, the Labor Department said on Tuesday….

The Supreme Court’s decision, which was 6 to 3, with the liberal justices in dissent, said the Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, did not have the authority to require workers to be vaccinated for coronavirus or tested weekly, describing the agency’s approach as “a blunt instrument.” The mandate would have applied to some 80 million people if it had not been struck down.

The Labor Department’s decision to withdraw the rule means that the outstanding legal proceedings will be dropped. The case was headed back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati for further consideration….

There are certainly more important hills to die on, than this one, for Mr. Biden.

So, as is often the case — many lawyers will make lots of money, giving seminars on how larger and smaller employers even, may avoid being sued under one of these patchwork state level measures — specifically under Gov. Abbott’s, or Gov. DeSantis’s unscientific executive orders.

It is fascinating though that — in the main — the GOP showed open distain for workers’ health and safety and union-organizing rights for over a half-century, here… and it still does, except on this one MAGA issue. Silly, that. But whatever.

Onward, grinning… frigid but clear here tonight. Hey you, once at 1:20 pm local!

नमस्ते

California Tangent — And Holmes’ Sentencing Date Set: September 26, 2022.

First, perhaps Billy will grace us with a trivia quiz (hint. hint.) near(er) the time of the hearing — as he did for Martin Shkreli, before Elizabeth Holmes. We will also run a office pool, on what her term of incarceration will be (in comments) — taking guesses as much as one week in advance, up until the night before the hearing. Here’s the latest, on scheduling:

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File:

Post-Trial Motions to be filed by 3/4/2022.

Motion Hearing set for 6/16/2022 at 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila.

Sentencing set for 9/26/2022 at 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2022)….

Next, as a tangent, we update the Sirhan Sirhan story.

Overnight, in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom exercised some of his office’s power, and denied Bobby Kennedy’s assassin any release from prison (my prior backgrounder).

To be sure, it has now been 53-1/2 years. Is this a wise and just use of executive power? I am uncertain, thus.

California’s Governor Newsom has countermanded the decision to release Mr. Sirhan.

In an editorial, the Governor referred to the fact that the crime was broadcast on live television, during a dark season of political assassinations: five years earlier, his brother — a sitting President, and only months after Dr. King’s assassination.

I am not sure we would ever see a repeat of that — since security is so much tighter now.

So, I am not sure that is a very-persuasive factor for denying his release. It is true the majority of Bobby’s remaining linear family (and his widow) oppose release and that should count for something.

Onward, into a cold gray dawn… with the Holmes sentencing now docketed for September, due to Covid backups. Her son, Will, will thus be over a year old and perhaps a year and a half, when she is locked up. To be certain, she will have to go to prison. And perhaps we will have a trivia sheet, and sentence duration pool, as we did with Martin, then. [Cough! BillytheKi.]

नमस्ते

It Probably Made Zero Difference Here — But This Is Why Defense Lawyers Almost Never Let The Client Testify — At Felony Trials.

The word out this week, post verdict, is that most jurors found Ms. Holmes to be the least credible witness that they heard from, in the whole affair.

But as I say, given the cornucopia of written evidence against her (as was true in Martin Shkreli’s felony trial), it is likely that the defense counsel felt she had little left to lose (and maybe a tiny bit to gain) by testifying.

So she did — and here are the reviews, from at least some on the jury:

On the four guilty counts, jurors found the evidence clearly convincing, with one juror describing two pieces as “smoking guns” in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. One piece was a Theranos-authored report that Holmes gave to investors; it had a Pfizer logo at the top of every page, making it look like the pharmaceutical company had either written or approved its findings. The second was a set of financial projections that Holmes shared with investors, including Lakeshore Capital Management, the DeVos family office.

There were just so many falsehoods on that sheet of paper,” said Susanna Stefanek, an editorial manager at Apple who was known at the trial as Juror No. 8. “She was trying to make this thing look better than it was, and that was just clearly a deceptive act….”

So — given the over $120 million in direct losses, as found by the jury, she could easily get up to 15 years (and perhaps, just perhaps, over 20 years). That’s how the guidelines, as properly applied, work.

Onward, ever smiling — but missing my grown, and genuinely great, kids — already.